On the Role of Courts in Climate Policy: Comment on Lando
Document Type
Response or Comment
Publication Date
2024
ISSN
1555-5879
Publisher
De Gruyter
Language
en-US
Abstract
This is a response to Henrik Lando’s article on courts and climate policies. Lando’s argument can be summarized in two propositions. The first is that EU courts have adopted a suboptimal legal standard for evaluating climate policies. Lando’s second proposition is that courts are not a good forum for the evaluation of climate policies because of the need to focus on the narrow interests of the litigants before the courts. I agree with Lando’s first proposition, but I disagree somewhat with his second proposition. It is pitched too broadly in my view.
Recommended Citation
Keith N. Hylton,
On the Role of Courts in Climate Policy: Comment on Lando
,
in
20
Review of Law and Economics
197
(2024).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/3933
