Document Type
Working Paper
Publication Date
Spring 2024
ISSN
1944-3706
Publisher
Southern University Law Center
Language
en-US
Abstract
This is my third paper on the Restatement (Third) of Torts. In my first paper, The Theory of Tort Doctrine and the Restatement (Third) of Torts, I offered a positive economic theory of the tort doctrine that had been presented in the Restatement (Third) of Torts: General Principles, and also an optimistic vision of how positive theoretical analysis could be integrated with the Restatement project. In my second paper, The Economics of the Restatement and of the Common Law, I set out the utilitarian-economic theory of how the common law litigation process could generate optimal (efficient, wealth-maximizing) rules and compared that process to the process by which the Restatement identifies and articulates rules. In this paper, I am looking back and assessing the connection between positive tort theory and the Restatement. My general argument is that positive tort theory has been successful in explaining the grounds for the common law of torts, and at the same time it remains an underutilized and underexploited resource for the Restatement project.
Recommended Citation
Keith N. Hylton,
Tort Theory and the Restatement, in Retrospect
,
in
52
Southwestern Law Review
369
(2024).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/3447
Comments
Updated with published article on 9/13/2024
Draft available as additional file.