Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-2018
Publisher
Boston University School of Law
Language
en-us
Abstract
The paradigmatic defendant in a patent lawsuit is a vertically integrated manufacturer. But much economic activity is conducted collaboratively by a supply chain of vertically disintegrated firms, and sometimes multiple firms are implicated in infringing activities, by making, selling, or using patented technology, or by contributing to or inducing another firm’s infringement. Often patent owners have the option of suing some or all of the members of a supply chain who contribute to the design, creation and marketing of a new technology.
Businesses increasingly contemplate the risk of patent infringement when they negotiate contractual relations to form a supply chain. Upstream and downstream firms recognize they may be jointly liable for patent infringement because of their relationship to each other and their connection to the new product. An interesting and difficult question is: how should they manage infringement risk to maximize their joint profit? Which firm should control litigation? Or should they plan for joint control? Should they share responsibility for damages and litigation expenses? If yes, what determines each party’s share. This Article provides guidance regarding the choice of efficient terms in indemnification agreements that respond to two objectives: efficient risk management and effective bargaining against a patent-plaintiff.
Recommended Citation
Michael J. Meurer,
Allocating Patent Litigation Risk Across the Supply Chain
,
in
18-02
Boston University School of Law, Law and Economics Research Paper Series
(2018).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/280
Comments
Published as "Allocating Patent Litigation Risk Across the Supply Chain," 25 Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal 251 (2018).