Document Type

Article

Publication Date

6-2005

ISSN

0006-8047

Publisher

Boston University School of Law

Language

en-US

Abstract

Professor Lynn Baker's contribution to this symposium' extends her longterm project both to defend and to critique the Supreme Court's decisions on the scope of congressional power.2 I find this work valuable and not a little provocative. If Baker's account of the decisions thus far is even partly right, the Court is poised to assume decision-making responsibility that has long been ceded to Congress. If her proposals for the future are adopted, we are in for a cataclysmic constitutional event that rivals the convulsive period when the nation confronted the judicial arrogation of authority associated (rightly or wrongly) with the decision we're here to remember: Lochner v. New York.3 Concomitantly, we are faced with the same methodological masks the Lochner Court wore to conceal what it was actually about. With a few notable exceptions, the modem Court has revealed no inclination routinely to superintend state regulatory policy.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.