Document Type

Article

Publication Date

6-2005

ISSN

0006-8047

Publisher

Boston University School of Law

Language

en-US

Abstract

Professor Lynn Baker's contribution to this symposium extends her long term project both to defend and to critique the Supreme Court's decisions on the scope of congressional power. I find this work valuable and not a little provocative. If Baker's account of the decisions thus far is even partly right, the Court is poised to assume decision-making responsibility that has long been ceded to Congress. If her proposals for the future are adopted, we are in for a cataclysmic constitutional event that rivals the convulsive period when the nation confronted the judicial arrogation of authority associated (rightly or wrongly) with the decision we're here to remember: Lochner v. New York. Concomitantly, we are faced with the same methodological masks the Lochner Court wore to conceal what it was actually about. With a few notable exceptions, the modem Court has revealed no inclination routinely to superintend state regulatory policy.

Comments

Symposium: Lochner Centennial Conference

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.