Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2009
ISSN
0028-4823
Publisher
New England School of Law
Language
En-US
Abstract
In this essay, I examine Justice Ginsburg's dissenting opinion in Bush v. Gore, the decision that ended the 2000 controversy over the winner of the presidency. I look critically at Justice Ginsburg's invocation of federalism-based deference to the Florida courts' interpretations of state election law in the recount controversy. I consider also Justice Ginsburg's criticisms of the Court's remedial decision to stop the recounts. Finally, I take up the much-debated question of how to understand Justice Ginsburg's final two words: "I dissent," rather than "I respectfully dissent." My conclusion is that the omission of "respectfully" is pointed, but not for the simple reasons usually given. More significant, I think, is her decision not to point to possible future positive consequences of a decision from which she dissents – a strategy she often has followed in other cases, even ones in which her disagreement with the Court is deep.
Recommended Citation
Hugh Baxter,
Justice Ginsburg's Dissent in Bush v. Gore
,
in
43
New England Law Review
711
(2009).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/506
