Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2026
ISSN
0038-3910
Publisher
University of Southern California
Language
en-US
Abstract
What does criminal punishment do? Across centuries of criminal legal thought, a shared answer persists: punishment incapacitates the wrongdoer. And yet punishment sometimes yields its opposite. Paradoxically, punishment sometimes becomes a rallying point-expanding community identification and solidarity around the defendant. This Article shows this punishment paradox using the 2023-24 prosecutions of President Trump and recent and historical case examples-from Luigi Mangione to Karen Read to Rosa Parks. By arguing that criminal law can generate solidarity rather than stigma, the Article both rethinks foundational theories of punishment and reconsiders the role of criminal law in democratic politics. Such an approach transcends the commonplace of "lawfare" and "no one is above the law.
Recommended Citation
Steven A. Koh,
The Punishment Paradox
,
100
Southern California Law Review
(2026).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/4216
Included in
Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Philosophy Commons

Comments
DRAFT – PLEASE DO NOT CITE WITHOUT PERMISSION
DRAFT – PLEASE DO NOT CITE WITHOUT PERMISSION