Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2026
ISSN
0017-8322
Publisher
University of California Hastings College of Law
Language
en-US
Abstract
Civic institutions—the rule of law, universities, and a free press—are the backbone of democratic life. They are the mechanisms through which complex societies encourage cooperation and stability, while also adapting to changing circumstances. The real superpower of institutions is their ability to evolve and adapt within a hierarchy of authority and a framework for roles and rules, while maintaining legitimacy for the knowledge produced and the actions taken. Purpose-driven institutions built around transparency, cooperation, and accountability empower individuals to take intellectual risks and challenge the status quo. This happens through the machinations of interpersonal relationships within those institutions, which broaden perspectives and strengthen shared commitment to civic goals.
Unfortunately, the affordances of AI systems extinguish these institutional features at every turn. In this essay, we make one simple point: AI systems are built to function in ways that degrade and are likely to destroy our crucial civic institutions. The affordances of AI systems erode expertise, short-circuit decision-making, and isolate people from each other. They are anathema to the kind of evolution, transparency, cooperation, and accountability that give vital institutions their purpose and sustainability. In short, current AI systems are a death sentence for civic institutions, and we should treat them as such.
Recommended Citation
Woodrow Hartzog & Jessica Silbey,
How AI Destroys Institutions
,
77
UC Law Journal
(2026).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/4179
Included in
Communications Law Commons, Computer Law Commons, Law and Society Commons, Science and Technology Law Commons

Comments
UC Law Journal forthcoming 2026