Author granted license

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

4-2023

ISSN

0038-3910

Publisher

University of Southern California Gould School of Law

Language

en-US

Abstract

Inflation is a problem of tremendous scale. But the leading response to inflation-raising interest rates-also poses economic risks. Raising interest rates rapidly may increase unemployment and heighten the chance of recession. This Article argues that there is a better way to think about antiinflation policy. Rather than defaulting to interest rate hikes that harm markets, policymakers should prioritize laws that lower prices while improving markets. Most importantly, there is evidence that businesses have raised prices by colluding with one another, exploiting consumers' behavioral and informational limits, and lobbying for protectionist laws that block competition. Artificial intelligence pricing algorithms and dark pattern online manipulation tools have further enhanced businesses' ability to charge higher prices. Although those preexisting market failures did not cause the high levels of inflation that began in 2021, they create new inflation challenges and opportunities.

A key challenge is that in an era of automated pricing algorithms and market failures, direct solutions to inflation, like the end of the war in Ukraine, may not bring the full level of lowered prices that would be otherwise expected. Fortunately, market failures now also provide an inflation-fighting tool that would not otherwise exist-like a piggy bank of market improvements that the law can break open to offset some portion of inflation. Interest rate hikes would surely still be needed, perhaps to address the bulk of inflation, but avoiding even a small amount of economically harmful rate hikes is still worthwhile. Many of these market improvement opportunities lie in existing administrative agency authority, but considerably more could be done through new legislation, such as a wide-ranging Price Transparency Act. Moreover, these legal reforms are desirable independent of inflation because they would improve efficiency. Thus, policymakers should resist the urge to rely solely on interest rate hikes that destroy wealth and should instead simultaneously pursue legal rules that promote prosperity. Doing so could even transform a grave crisis into a tremendous economic opportunity

Comments

Update with published article on 9/10/2024.

Draft available as additional file

Find on SSRN Link to Publisher Site

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.