Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2009
ISSN
2641-0397
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Language
en-US
Abstract
To bring the United States in line with prevailing human rights standards, its National HIV/AIDS Strategy will need to explicitly commit to a human rights framework when developing programmes and policies that serve the unaddressed needs of women. This paper focuses on two aspects of the institutionalized mistreatment of people with HIV: 1) the criminalization of their consensual sexual conduct; and 2) the elimination of informed and documented consensual participation in their diagnosis through reliance on mandatory and opt-out testing policies. More than half of US states have HIV-specific laws criminalizing the consensual sexual activity of people with HIV, regardless of whether transmission occurs. Many of these laws hinge prosecution on the failure of HIV-positive people to disclose their HIV status to a sexual partner. The Obama Administration should explore administrative and legislative incentives to eliminate these laws and prosecutions, and target a portion of prevention funding for anti-stigma training. Testing policies should be reconsidered to remove opt-out and/or mandatory HIV testing as a condition for receipt of federal funding; incentives should encourage states to adopt local policies mandating counseling; and voluntary HIV testing should be offered regardless of the provider's undocumented perception of an individual's risk.
Recommended Citation
Aziza Ahmed, Catherine Hanssens & Brook Kelly,
Protecting HIV Positive Women’s Human’s Rights: Recommendations for the Obama Administration
,
in
17
Reproductive Health Matters
127
(2009).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/3115
Included in
Criminal Law Commons, Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Human Rights Law Commons
