Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1988

ISSN

0277-318X

Language

en-US

Abstract

Virginia is for lovers, California is for surfers, and apparently New Jersey is for those seeking "death with dignity."' At least that was the initial media reaction to a trilogy of right-to-die cases recently decided by the New Jersey Supreme Court. Unfortunately, for those seeking clear answers to difficult questions of biomedical ethics, the rights of both competent and incompetent patients to refuse life-sustaining treatment are not nearly as well-settled in New Jersey as the media accounts suggest. Moreover, far from reasserting itself as a "leader" in right-to-die litigation, the New Jersey Supreme Court continues to impose limitations beyond those required by most other state courts.

Link to Publisher Site (BU Community Subscription)

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.