Enforcing Coasian Bribes for Non-Price Benefits: A New Role for Restitution
Reprinted in Restitution 347, Lionel D. Smith, ed., Ashgate Publishing (2001).
Abstract
In Boomer v. Muir, a subcontractor on a hydroelectric project continued to provide goods and services even though the value of the performance far exceeded the contract price. The general contactor, who was receiving the goods and services, breached the contract even though he was paying less than market value for them.
This paper has been withdrawn.
