Document Type
Working Paper
Publication Date
11-27-2006
Language
en-US
Abstract
Significant change is anticipated in the Japanese Consumption Tax. The Japanese Tax Commission is recommending that the rate should double, multiple rates should be employed, and the "bookkeeping method" of accounting should be abandoned in favor of the European "invoice method."
The Tax Commission faces a tax policy dilemma. The aging population drives the need for a tax increase (making the Consumption Tax an obvious target for revenue enhancement) at exactly the same time the population is shrinking in overall size, thereby reducing the number of working-consumers who can pay the higher tax.
These are dramatic changes for the Japanese Consumption Tax. While revenue needs drive the primary change (the rate increase), it is the inherent regressivity of the tax that drives the second (the adoption of multiple rates). The third change (the use of an invoice method of accounting) is an inevitable consequence of multiple rates. Thus, aside from the rate increase itself it is the structural regressivity of this tax on consumption that is the driver of the most significant of the proposed structural changes. Can this inherent characteristic be changed?
This paper proposes a way out of this dilemma. It proposes the adoption of certified transaction tax software at the point of (final) sale, and the distribution (for voluntary use by the needy) of IDs embedded with (a) digitally recognized biometric identifiers and (b) digital tax exemption certificates. Rates could then rise without excessively burdening the poor, elderly and handicapped.
Recommended Citation
Richard T. Ainsworth,
Biometrics, Certified Software Solutions, and the Japanese Consumption Tax: A Proposal for the Tax Commission
(2006).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/1495
Included in
Banking and Finance Law Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Computer Law Commons, International Law Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Science and Technology Law Commons, Tax Law Commons