Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-2016
ISSN
0003-1453
Publisher
American University
Language
en-US
Abstract
Sales transaction taxes are highly susceptible to technology fraud, which is an inevitable result of today’s widespread reliance on technology to document taxed transactions. Technology can be (and is) manipulated to defeat the collection of these taxes. Both the U.S. retail sales tax (RST) and the European value added tax (VAT) are vulnerable to technology-based fraud. This Article concerns sales suppression — intentionally not recording sales — in the RST, and at the final stage of the VAT, the retail stage, when tax is collected from final consumers.
The modern electronic cash register (ECR)/point of sale (POS) system is vulnerable to fraud. These devices are essentially computers with programming that is molded to meet the commercial needs of any particular business.
This Article will focus on a particular POS system called Profitek, manufactured in Vancouver by InfoSpec, which uses an MS SQL server, and can be purchased with a dedicated sales suppression device — the Profitek Zapper.
The cash register/POS market divides along database lines and the market further subdivides when attributes such as operator language preferences are considered. The market for POS systems is both niche and international, and so are sales suppression software applications. It is common, therefore, to find that the same person who sells an ECR/POS system is also able to provide the business with the zapper that can suppress sales recorded in that specific system.
An application that effectively manipulates the digital records of a specific POS system will quickly travel to other countries and states with the associated POS system for which it was designed.
This Article follows the InfoSpec/Profitek system and its associated zapper as it migrated from the Canadian restaurant market into the U.S. market.
Recommended Citation
Richard T. Ainsworth,
Sales Suppression: The International Dimension
,
in
65
American University Law Review
1241
(2016).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/1423
Included in
Banking and Finance Law Commons, Business Organizations Law Commons, Science and Technology Law Commons, Tax Law Commons
