Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2004
ISSN
1748-720X
Publisher
American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics
Language
en-US
Abstract
In his compelling novel Blindness, José Saramago tells us about victims stricken by a contagious form of blindness who were quarantined and came to see themselves as pigs, dogs, and “lame crabs.” Of course, they were all human beings - although unable to perceive themselves, or others, as members of the human community. The disciplines of bioethics, health law, and human rights are likewise all members of the broad human rights community, although at times none of them may be able to see the homologies, even when responding to a specific health challenge.
The boundaries between bioethics, health law, and human rights are permeable, and border crossings, including crossings by blind practitioners, are common. Two working hypotheses form the intellectual framework of this article: we can more effectively address the major health issues of our day if we harmonize all three disciplines; and American bioethics can be reborn as a global force by accepting its Nuremberg roots and actively engaging in a health and human rights agenda.
Recommended Citation
George J. Annas,
American Bioethics and Human Rights: The End of All Our Exploring
,
in
32
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
658
(2004).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/1316
