The Argument that Wasn't
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
7-2-2015
Publisher
Health Affairs Publishing
Language
en-US
Abstract
Together with my student and the Jewish Alliance for Law and Social Action (JALSA), I wrote a brief arguing that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of § 36B, which would have treated health insurance subsidies as an incentive for states to establish exchanges, would raise serious constitutional problems.
Recommended Citation
Abigail Moncrieff,
The Argument that Wasn't
,
Health Affairs Forefront
(2015).
Available at:
https://doi.org/10.1377/forefront.20150702.049112
Find on SSRN
Link to Publisher Site
COinS
Please note the file available on SSRN may not be the final published version of this work.
