Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2001
ISSN
0017-8322
Publisher
University of California, Hastings College of the Law
Language
en-US
Abstract
The staple article of commerce doctrine must strike a balance between a copyright holder's legitimate demand for effective-not merely symbolic-protection of the statutory monopoly, and the rights of others freely to engage in substantially unrelated areas of commerce.
In Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, the Supreme Court created the copyright version of the so-called "staple article of commerce doctrine."'2 Its stated objective was to strike a balance between the incentive objectives of copyright3 and the interests of the public in access to new technology.4 As defined by the Court, the doctrine prevents copyright holders from interfering with the sale of technologies that may be used to infringe, but that also have "substantial non-infringing uses."'5
Recommended Citation
Stacey Dogan,
Is Napster a VCR? The Implications of Sony for Napster and Other Internet Technologies
,
in
52
Hastings Law Journal
939
(2001).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/1049
