Document Type
Article
Publication Date
6-2017
Publisher
The Virginia Law Review Association
Language
en-US
Abstract
My own view is that Goold overstates the explanatory role of tort law. But even were that not the case, the courts need to reach some kind of “settled” understanding on these various interests before a cause of action is created or definitively rejected, and that no such consensus on the three matters mentioned yet exists, whether they are viewed as forms of tort or otherwise. Goold’s work may nevertheless be an important step toward reaching closure on these and other open questions in copyright law.
Recommended Citation
Wendy J. Gordon,
Copyright Owners' Putative Interests in Privacy, Reputation, and Control: A Reply to Goold
,
in
103
Virginia Law Review Online
36
(2017).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/1
