Document Type
Article Review
Publication Date
8-8-2018
ISSN
2330-1295
Publisher
JOTWELL
Language
en-US
Abstract
I feel a bit like Gilligan in one of my favorite episodes of Gilligan’s island. The Professor and the Skipper are having an argument over some issue vital to the castaway’s prospects of being rescued from the island. Gilligan is standing in the middle agreeing with everything both parties to the argument say, and finally the two disputants become fed up with Gilligan’s endorsement of diametrically opposing views and they turn on him. In this Jot, I praise two articles that take conflicting views on an issue vital to the future of administrative law, namely, when should federal courts, confronted with unconstitutional or otherwise illegal Executive Branch action, issue nationwide injunctions: Sam Bray’s Multiple Chancellors: Reforming the National Injunction, and Amanda Frost’s In Defense of Nationwide Injunctions. Hopefully, the reader won’t turn on me.
Recommended Citation
Jack M. Beermann,
Two Views on the Nationwide Injunction
,
in
JOTWELL
(2018).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/shorter_works/73
Publisher URL
https://adlaw.jotwell.com/two-views-on-the-nationwide-injunction/
