Document Type


Publication Date





University of California - Davis




The recent indictments of former President Trump are stirring national debate about their effects on American society. Commentators speculate on the cases’ impact outside of the courtroom — on the 2024 election, on political polarization, and on the future of American democracy. Such cases originated in the prosecutor’s office, begging the question of if, when, and how prosecutors should consider the societal effects of the cases they bring.

Indeed, prosecutors often publicly claim that they “send a message” when they indict a defendant. What, exactly, does this mean? Often, their assumption is that such messaging goes in one direction: indictment — and subsequent criminal process — will communicate to the general public a message of accountability regarding certain proscribed conduct. Using the context of socially prominent cases and foreign affairs prosecutions, this Article argues that prosecutors are comparatively ill-suited to consider such prosecutorial messaging because they lack relative capacity to appreciate societal response, or the divergent ways communities will make sense of criminal cases. This Article explains the mechanism of societal response as social meaning. It concludes by calling for democratization and decriminalization in criminal law.


Copyright © 2023 Steven Arrigg Koh

Find on SSRN Link to Publisher Site



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.