Author granted license

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International

Document Type


Publication Date





Loyola University of Chicago Law Journal




This Article describes and analyzes qualitative interview data collected over a five-year period. The goal of the interviews was to explore the roles of intellectual property (“IP”) in IP rich fields. Interviews were with diverse actors in a wide-range of industries: film, book publishing, visual arts, internet commerce, biology, engineering, chemistry, computer science. The data described and analyzed in this Article focuses on the specific question about the diverse functioning of patents in the subset of interviewees who are scientists and engineers, their lawyers and business partners. The Article proceeds in two parts. Part I describes the empirical dimension of the research in more detail, highlighting the unique qualitative aspect of this research and comparing it to the more common quantitative method. Part II describes the variation across the interviews, culling from the data the diverse ways patents function beyond the doctrinally orthodox and predominantly singular explanation that patents facilitate the recuperation of research and development costs through exclusivity. The Article concludes with some thoughts on the implications of this diversity in light of the traditional and largely monolithic explanation for patent rights in the United States.

Find on SSRN



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.