Promoting Innovation While Preventing Discrimination: Policy Goals for the Scored Society

Authors

Danielle K. Citron, Boston University School of LawFollow
Frank Pasquale, University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law

Author granted license

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

12-2014

ISSN

0043-0617

Publisher

University of Washington School of Law

Language

en-US

Abstract

There are several normative theories of jurisprudence supporting our critique of the scored society, which complement the social theory and political economy presented in our 2014 article on that topic in the Washington Law Review. This response to Professor Tal Zarsky clarifies our antidiscrimination argument while showing that is only one of many bases for the critique of scoring practices. The concerns raised by Big Data may exceed the capacity of extant legal doctrines. Addressing the potential injustice may require the hard work of legal reform.

Comments

Response to Tal Z. Zarsky, Understanding Discrimination in the Scored Society, 89 Washington Law Review 1375 (2014)

Recommended Citation

Danielle K. Citron & Frank Pasquale, Promoting Innovation While Preventing Discrimination: Policy Goals for the Scored Society , in 89 Washington Law Review 1413 (2014).
Available at: https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/637