Document Type
Brief
Publication Date
3-28-2024
Publisher
Supreme Court of the United States
Language
en-US
Abstract
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd, preempts Idaho law in the narrow but important circumstance where terminating a pregnancy is required to stabilize an emergency medical condition that would otherwise threaten serious harm to the pregnant woman’s health but the State prohibits an emergency-room physician from providing that care.
Recommended Citation
Nicole Huberfeld, Timothy S. Jost, Linda C. McClain, Wendy E. Parmet, Erwin Chemerinsky, Elizabeth McCuskey, Danielle Pelfrey Duryea, Gabriel Scheffler & George J. Annas,
Brief for Amici Curiae Legal Scholars Supporting Respondent
(2024).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/3752
