Author granted license

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2004

ISSN

0009-3599

Publisher

Chicago-Kent College of Law

Language

en-US

Abstract

When I graduated from law school in 1985, there were no courses offered in employee benefits law. Nor, as near as I can recall, was ERISA ever discussed in any of the labor and employment classes I took. There was no mention in the introductory labor law course or in other classes about employment discrimination, union organizing, and employment arbitration. Now, in contrast, many law schools include a course on employee benefits and ERISA, and students hoping to work in the labor and employment area frequently find that ERISA work is plentiful, and traditional NLRA work is not. This, of course, reflects larger changes in the market for legal services. This past term, the U.S. Supreme Court did not decide a single NLRA case. There is anecdotal evidence which suggests that unions avoid federal litigation whenever possible, because the courts are perceived to be hostile to their interests. Whatever the explanation, the action in the labor and employment arena has clearly moved from traditional labor law to employment law and employee benefits.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.