Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-2011
ISSN
0006-8047
Publisher
Boston University School of Law
Language
en-US
Abstract
Most fiduciary relationships determine with specificity the beneficiaries of the fiduciary's activities. Not-for-profit entities, however, serve a class of unspecified beneficiaries and can exercise discretion in determining who to serve and how to serve them. This paper explores the limits of discretion that recent litigation established for Fisk University in balancing its educational mission and its administration of a valuable art collection donated decades earlier. The paper analyzes the case as it addresses respect for donor conditions, changes in circumstance, standing issues, the doctrine of cy pres and the designation of the appropriate class of public beneficiaries. Race and geography also play contributing roles.
Recommended Citation
Alan L. Feld,
Who Are the Beneficiaries of Fisk University's Stieglitz Collection?
,
in
91
Boston University Law Review
873
(2011).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/436
Comments
Symposium: The Role of Fiduciary Law and Trust in the Twenty-First Century: A Conference Inspired by the Work of Tamar Frankel