Document Type
Article
Publication Date
9-17-2025
ISSN
2574-3805
Publisher
JAMA Network
Language
en-US
Abstract
It is often said that a business without marketing is dead. But when a medical product is marketed irresponsibly, it is patients who may pay with their lives. In this context, Wieberdink et al1 examine participation in industry-sponsored speakers’ bureaus by academic clinical faculty, conceptualizing the practice as a form of conflicted and irresponsible pharmaceutical marketing. Reviewing 129 US allopathic medical school conflict-of-interest (COI) policies, they found that less than 40% prohibit industry speakers’ bureau participation outright, while 19% impose conditional restrictions, such as requiring that faculty retain control over presentation content. Wieberdink et al1 advocate for a total ban.
This perspective examines whether such a ban is justified, contextualizing the speakers’ bureau model within its epistemic, regulatory, and historical dimensions. We conclude that even if banned by universities, industry likely would redirect funding to other channels of influence, a phenomenon akin to placing a finger in a stream only to see the water flow around it. To truly reduce economic COIs from biopharmaceutical companies in the production and dissemination of medical product evidence, as Wieberdink et al1 support, would require a complete overhaul of the US health care system, including who is funded as well as how clinical trials, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), medical journals, and continuing medical education are funded. Absent such a full overhaul, we conclude with a practical strategy for reducing conflicts from speakers’ bureau participation in the educational sector.
Recommended Citation
Jennifer E. Miller & Christopher Robertson,
The Ethics of Industry-Funded Speakers’ Bureaus—How They Disseminate Innovation and Could Corrupt Medicine
,
8
Jama Network Open
e2532331
(2025).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/4124
Included in
Food and Drug Law Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons
