Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-7-2025
ISSN
2330-1295
Publisher
JOTWELL
Language
en-US
Abstract
Elizabeth Sepper, Free Exercise of Abortion, 49 BYU L. Rev. 177 (2023).
In 1973, before the Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade, two members of a group of clergy committed to helping women receive abortion care stated: “every woman must possess the freedom, guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, to follow her religious conscience in the determination of whether she will or will not bear a child.”1 Religious supporters of abortion access also cited the Establishment Clause: states were adopting, in a religiously diverse nation, a religious view about when life begins and how to value fetal and maternal life. These pre-Roe examples, Elizabeth Sepper argues in Free Exercise of Abortion, are part of a long history of recognizing the religious dimensions of abortion decisions. A significant post-Roe example is the initial success, in federal district court, of a free exercise challenge to the Hyde Amendment, which excluded most abortions from Medicaid coverage while funding all other pregnancy-related expenses. After hearing extensive testimony by religious authorities about religious teachings on abortion, Judge Dooling framed a woman’s abortion decision, when “medically necessary to her health” and exercised “in conformity with religious belief and teaching,” as “conscientious,” and doubly protected under the Due Process Clause and the First Amendment.2 However, the U.S. Supreme Court, in upholding the Hyde Amendment in Harris v. MacRae, avoided reaching the Free Exercise argument and rejected plaintiffs’ Establishment Clause argument
Recommended Citation
Linda C. McClain,
Reclaiming Abortion as a Moral—and Religious—Decision
,
JOTWELL
(2025).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/4031
