Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-1984
ISSN
0002-7162
Publisher
SAGE Publishing
Language
en-US
Abstract
Most government support of arts institutions is indirect—the result of charitable deduction provisions of the federal income tax, property tax exemptions extended by local governments, and other tax provisions. The money that government forgoes through these provisions must be made up by higher taxes for all taxpayers. The public, however, has little say about how these funds are spent. By its very nature, the income tax deduction places the decision-making power over arts institutions in the hands of those with high incomes. Those with high incomes receive a greater tax benefit for each dollar they contribute, increasing the amounts they donate, which increases the likelihood of their influence over those who run arts institutions, and they are allowed to place restrictions on the use of their gifts. Moreover the property tax exemption encourages arts institutions to invest heavily in real estate, which is not necessarily in the public's best interests. Replacing some indirect subsidies with direct subsidies and granting tax credits for donations in place of tax deductions would go a long way toward making the system more equitable.
Recommended Citation
Alan L. Feld & Michael O'Hare,
Indirect Aid to the Arts
,
in
471
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
132
(1984).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/2954
