Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1992
ISSN
0748-383X
Publisher
Case Western Reserve University School of Law
Language
en-US
Abstract
Since World War II there have been persistent efforts at both the national and international level to develop rules to protect the rights and welfare of subjects of human experimentation.' These efforts have focused primarily on codifying the rights of subjects, and protecting their welfare by prior peer review of research protocols. In recent years research regulations have been under attack by politicians, drug companies, researchers, and advocacy groups. In less than half a century, human experimentation has been transformed from a suspect activity into a presumptively beneficial activity. With this transformation, traditional distinctions between experimentation and therapy, subject and patient, and researcher and physician have become discouragingly blurred. Issues of power, money, control, and fear of death have often been more central than protection of the rights and welfare of research subjects.
Recommended Citation
George J. Annas,
The Changing Landscape of Human Experimentation: Nuremberg, Helsinki, and Beyond
,
in
2
Health Matrix, The Journal of Law-Medicine
119
(1992).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/1224
